Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal: HANDLER_EXIT should clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Thu Feb 10 2022 - 13:16:52 EST


Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Fatal SIGSYS signals were not being delivered to pid namespace init
> processes . Make sure the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE doesn't get set for these
^ when ptraced.
> cases.



Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I have pointed out a few nits in the wording but otherwise this looks good.
>
> Reported-by: Robert Święcki <robert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 00b06da29cf9 ("signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not get changed")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/signal.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 38602738866e..33e3ee4f3383 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1342,9 +1342,10 @@ force_sig_info_to_task(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
> }
> /*
> * Don't clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE for traced tasks, users won't expect
> - * debugging to leave init killable.
> + * debugging to leave init killable, unless it is intended to exit.
perhaps ^ HANDLER_EXIT is always fatal.
> */
> - if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL && !t->ptrace)
> + if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL &&
> + (!t->ptrace || (handler == HANDLER_EXIT)))
> t->signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE;
> ret = send_signal(sig, info, t, PIDTYPE_PID);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);

Eric