Re: [PATCH v2] random: add proper SPDX header

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

Hi Greg,

Thanks for the review. Comments are inline below.

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:49 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Where did the "or later" come from?  I don't see that in the original
> text.

Yea, this part seems a little bit ambiguous:

> > - * ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of
> > - * the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are
> > - * required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions.  (This clause is
> > - * necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and
> > - * the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.)
>
> I do not see a "or later" here.

I don't see a "2.0" either. I think we can infer from context that it
couldn't have been < 2.0. So in the absence of a number, maybe this
means >= 2.0, and hence "or later"? Or since at the time it probably
meant 2.0, do we infer this to mean == 2.0? I really have no idea,
which is why I'm glad this list exists.

It sounds like your perspective is that this is == 2.0?

> > diff --git a/include/linux/random.h b/include/linux/random.h
> > index e92efb39779c..1a6861aa1277 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/random.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/random.h
> > @@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
> >  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > -/*
> > - * include/linux/random.h
> > - *
> > - * Include file for the random number generator.
> > - */
>
> This doesn't have to do with the SPDX change in the other file, it
> belongs in a different patch, sorry.

Ack.

Jason