Re: [PATCH 10/11] block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"

[Jan Kara]

On Thu 10-02-22 16:37:52, NeilBrown wrote:
> bfq_get_queue() expects a "bool" for the third arg, so pass "false"
> rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC" which will soon be removed.
> 
> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

								Honza

> ---
>  block/bfq-iosched.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 0c612a911696..4e645ae1e066 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -5448,7 +5448,7 @@ static void bfq_check_ioprio_change(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio)
>  	bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, false);
>  	if (bfqq) {
>  		bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq);
> -		bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, BLK_RW_ASYNC, bic, true);
> +		bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, false, bic, true);
>  		bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, false);
>  	}
>  
> 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR