[PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: property: Get rid of redundant 'else'

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed Feb 09 2022 - 09:53:14 EST


In the snippets like the following

if (...)
return / goto / break / continue ...;
else
...

the 'else' is redundant. Get rid of it.

While at it, replace conditional '<= 0' for unsigned type by '== 0'
in acpi_data_prop_read(); update comment in the
__acpi_node_get_property_reference() on how we parse the reference.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/property.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
index 4744c191acee..928aa4f86344 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
@@ -541,7 +541,8 @@ acpi_device_data_of_node(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
const struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode);
return &adev->data;
- } else if (is_acpi_data_node(fwnode)) {
+ }
+ if (is_acpi_data_node(fwnode)) {
const struct acpi_data_node *dn = to_acpi_data_node(fwnode);
return &dn->data;
}
@@ -739,14 +740,19 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
return -EINVAL;
}

- /* assume following integer elements are all args */
+ /*
+ * Assume the following integer elements are all args.
+ * Stop counting on the first reference or end of the
+ * package arguments. In case of neither reference,
+ * nor integer, return an error, we can't parse it.
+ */
for (i = 0; element + i < end && i < num_args; i++) {
int type = element[i].type;

+ if (type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE)
+ break;
if (type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
nargs++;
- else if (type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE)
- break;
else
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -938,7 +944,7 @@ static int acpi_data_prop_read(const struct acpi_device_data *data,

if (proptype != DEV_PROP_STRING && nval > obj->package.count)
return -EOVERFLOW;
- else if (nval <= 0)
+ if (nval == 0)
return -EINVAL;

items = obj->package.elements;
@@ -1000,14 +1006,10 @@ struct fwnode_handle *acpi_get_next_subnode(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
const struct list_head *head;
struct list_head *next;

- if (!child || is_acpi_device_node(child)) {
+ if ((!child || is_acpi_device_node(child)) && adev) {
struct acpi_device *child_adev;

- if (adev)
- head = &adev->children;
- else
- goto nondev;
-
+ head = &adev->children;
if (list_empty(head))
goto nondev;

@@ -1077,7 +1079,8 @@ acpi_node_get_parent(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
if (is_acpi_data_node(fwnode)) {
/* All data nodes have parent pointer so just return that */
return to_acpi_data_node(fwnode)->parent;
- } else if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
+ }
+ if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
struct device *dev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode)->dev.parent;

if (dev)
--
2.34.1