Re: [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: Protect lockdep functions with #ifdef

From: Jani Nikula
Date: Wed Feb 09 2022 - 08:49:13 EST


On Tue, 08 Feb 2022, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 10:51 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 08 Feb 2022, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > With upcoming lock tracepoints config, it'd define some of lockdep
>> > functions without enabling CONFIG_LOCKDEP actually. The existing code
>> > assumes those functions will be removed by the preprocessor but it's
>> > not the case anymore. Let's protect the code with #ifdef's explicitly.
>>
>> I don't understand why you can't keep the no-op stubs for
>> CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n.
>
> Because I want to use the lockdep annotation for other purposes.
> But the workqueue lockdep_map was defined under LOCKDEP
> only. Please see the description in the cover letter.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220208184208.79303-1-namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx/

So lockdep_init_map() might still be there and build just fine for
CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n, but now we're actually required to wrap all call sites
in #ifdefs depending on the purpose? I'm not convinced yet.

BR,
Jani.


--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center