Re: [PATCH 1/4] ALSA: hda/realtek: fix mute/micmute LEDs for HP 855 G8

[Takashi Iwai]

On Sat, 05 Feb 2022 18:51:32 +0100,
Alexander Sergeyev wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 03:57:04PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > In anyway, we need to track down exactly which access triggers those 
> > errors...
> 
> I went deeper into codec reads and writes:
> - snd_hda_codec_write
> - snd_hdac_codec_write
> - codec_write
> - snd_hdac_exec_verb
> - codec_exec_verb
> - snd_hdac_bus_exec_verb_unlocked
> - azx_send_cmd / azx_get_response
> - snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd / azx_rirb_get_response
> 
> In the last functions a circular buffer is used to write commands. The 
> problem is that "bus->corb.buf[wp]" and "bus->rirb.res[addr]" are 
> nowhere close to the IOMMU-reported address of the offending memory 
> access. It's likely that I've missed other communication channels. But 
> is it possible that IOMMU-reported address and buffers addresses are of 
> different kinds (physical/virtual) or different regions mapped to the 
> same physical pages?
> 
> Example:
> snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd: bus->corb.buf[wp] = cpu_to_le32(val) // = 0x3b8000, wp=0xfb, &buf[wp]=00000000f1fd4592
> snd_hdac_bus_get_response: reading result from 0000000059c4003d
> snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd: bus->corb.buf[wp] = cpu_to_le32(val) // = 0x339000, wp=0xfc, &buf[wp]=000000007f14c128
> snd_hdac_bus_get_response: reading result from 0000000059c4003d
> snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd: bus->corb.buf[wp] = cpu_to_le32(val) // = 0x1470740, wp=0xfd, &buf[wp]=00000000a6b14901
> snd_hdac_bus_get_response: reading result from 0000000059c4003d
> snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd: bus->corb.buf[wp] = cpu_to_le32(val) // = 0x14ba000, wp=0xfe, &buf[wp]=00000000d8d1672a
> snd_hdac_bus_get_response: reading result from 0000000059c4003d
> snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd: bus->corb.buf[wp] = cpu_to_le32(val) // = 0x14b8000, wp=0xff, &buf[wp]=00000000b87b3287
> snd_hdac_bus_get_response: reading result from 0000000059c4003d
> snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd: bus->corb.buf[wp] = cpu_to_le32(val) // = 0x2ba000, wp=0x0, &buf[wp]=000000002162c728
> snd_hdac_bus_get_response: reading result from 0000000059c4003d
> snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd: bus->corb.buf[wp] = cpu_to_le32(val) // = 0x2b8000, wp=0x1, &buf[wp]=0000000095f61061
> snd_hda_intel 0000:05:00.6: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0015 address=0x1fffff800 flags=0x0020]

Hm, I'm not sure, either.  But let's try to avoid some possible
confusion at first, e.g. a patch like below.


Takashi

-- 8< --
diff --git a/sound/hda/hdac_controller.c b/sound/hda/hdac_controller.c
index f7bd6e2db085..074199aa73ea 100644
--- a/sound/hda/hdac_controller.c
+++ b/sound/hda/hdac_controller.c
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ int snd_hdac_bus_alloc_stream_pages(struct hdac_bus *bus)
 	if (WARN_ON(!num_streams))
 		return -EINVAL;
 	/* allocate memory for the position buffer */
-	err = snd_dma_alloc_pages(dma_type, bus->dev,
+	err = snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, bus->dev,
 				  num_streams * 8, &bus->posbuf);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ int snd_hdac_bus_alloc_stream_pages(struct hdac_bus *bus)
 		s->posbuf = (__le32 *)(bus->posbuf.area + s->index * 8);
 
 	/* single page (at least 4096 bytes) must suffice for both ringbuffes */
-	return snd_dma_alloc_pages(dma_type, bus->dev, PAGE_SIZE, &bus->rb);
+	return snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, bus->dev, PAGE_SIZE, &bus->rb);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_hdac_bus_alloc_stream_pages);