Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 4/9] bpf: use prog->jited_len in bpf_prog_ksym_set_addr()

[Song Liu]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:31 PM Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Using prog->jited_len is simpler and more accurate than current
> estimation (header + header->size).
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hmm... CI [1] reports error on test_progs 159/tailcalls, and bisect points to
this one. However, I couldn't figure out why this breaks tail call.
round_up(PAGE_SIZE) does fix it though. But that won't be accurate, right?

Any suggestions on what could be the reason for these failures?

Thanks,
Song

[1] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/5060194776?check_suite_focus=true

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index 14199228a6f0..e3fe53df0a71 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -537,13 +537,10 @@ long bpf_jit_limit_max __read_mostly;
>  static void
>  bpf_prog_ksym_set_addr(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  {
> -       const struct bpf_binary_header *hdr = bpf_jit_binary_hdr(prog);
> -       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)hdr;
> -
>         WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_prog_ebpf_jited(prog));
>
>         prog->aux->ksym.start = (unsigned long) prog->bpf_func;
> -       prog->aux->ksym.end   = addr + hdr->size;
> +       prog->aux->ksym.end   = prog->aux->ksym.start + prog->jited_len;
>  }
>
>  static void
> --
> 2.30.2
>