Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/preempt: add PREEMPT_DYNAMIC using static keys

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Feb 03 2022 - 17:41:06 EST

Next message: Dave Hansen: "Re: [PATCH 33/35] selftests/x86: Add map_shadow_stack syscall test"
Previous message: Bjorn Helgaas: "Re: [PATCH V6 03/10] PCI/DOE: Add Data Object Exchange Aux Driver"
In reply to: Mark Rutland: "Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/preempt: add PREEMPT_DYNAMIC using static keys"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:05:01PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> Anyone has an opinion on that? Can we do better on the arm64 static call side
> or should we resign ourself to using that static keys direction?

I don't hate this thing.

Next message: Dave Hansen: "Re: [PATCH 33/35] selftests/x86: Add map_shadow_stack syscall test"
Previous message: Bjorn Helgaas: "Re: [PATCH V6 03/10] PCI/DOE: Add Data Object Exchange Aux Driver"
In reply to: Mark Rutland: "Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/preempt: add PREEMPT_DYNAMIC using static keys"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]