Re: [PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf: use ELF_ET_DYN_BASE for PIE (ET_DYN with INTERP) binaries

From: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Feb 01 2022 - 08:16:21 EST


On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:18 PM Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 01:30:38PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 12:17 PM Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Since 9630f0d60fec ELF_ET_DYN_BASE is not used as a load_bias anymore
> > > and this breaks PIE binaries, since after this change data segment
> > > became too nearby the stack:
> > >
> > > Before 9630f0d60fec:
> > >
> > > $ strace -febrk /tmp/test-stack |& head
> > > brk(NULL) = 0x555555559000
> > > $ /tmp/test-stack
> > > bottom_of_stack = 0x7fffffffc5c0
> > > recursion depth: 1 (stack diff: 32)
> > > ...
> > > recursion depth: 7690 (stack diff: 8365664)
> > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > >
> > > After 9630f0d60fec:
> > >
> > > $ strace -ebrk /tmp/test-stack |& head
> > > brk(NULL) = 0x7ffff7fff000
> > >
> > > $ /tmp/test-stack
> > > bottom_of_stack = 0x7fffffffc640
> > > recursion depth: 1 (stack diff: 32)
> > > ...
> > > recursion depth: 146 (stack diff: 157792)
> > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > >
> > > Found this during compiling with clang, that started to randomly
> > > SIGSEGV when it eats some heap.
> >
> > How do I reproduce it on x86-64?
>
> It fails for me for pretty big C++ unit, so I don't have a simple
> reproducer with clang, but the attached reproducer below should show the
> problem.

The reproducer doesn't fail for me under 5.17-rc2 on Fedora 35/x86-64
with 32GB RAM. Did you turn off PF_RANDOMIZE?

> > > Reproducer:
> > >
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > > #include <stddef.h>
> > > #include <stdlib.h>
> > >
> > > static int depth = 0;
> > > static void* bottom_of_stack;
> > >
> > > int inner()
> > > {
> > > char buffer[1024];
> > > ptrdiff_t diff;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > ++depth;
> > > diff = bottom_of_stack - __builtin_frame_address(0);
> > >
> > > fprintf(stderr,
> > > "recursion depth: %i (stack diff: %zu)\n",
> > > depth, (size_t)diff);
> > >
> > > for (size_t i = 0; i < 1024; ++i)
> > > ret += buffer[i];
> > >
> > > ret += inner();
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > int main()
> > > {
> > > for (size_t size = 0; size < 128<<20; size += 16<<10)
> > > malloc(16<<10);
> > >
> > > bottom_of_stack = __builtin_frame_address(0);
> > > fprintf(stderr, "bottom_of_stack = %p\n", bottom_of_stack);
> > > inner();
> > > }



--
H.J.