Re: [PATCH 01/24] pinctrl: samsung: drop pin banks references on error paths

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03/01/2022 15:49, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 18:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The driver iterates over its devicetree children with
>> for_each_child_of_node() and stores for later found node pointer.  This
>> has to be put in error paths to avoid leak during re-probing.
>>
>> Fixes: ab663789d697 ("pinctrl: samsung: Match pin banks with their device nodes")
>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> index 8941f658e7f1..f2864a7869b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> @@ -1002,6 +1002,15 @@ samsung_pinctrl_get_soc_data_for_of_alias(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         return &(of_data->ctrl[id]);
>>  }
>>
>> +static void samsung_banks_of_node_put(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d)
>> +{
>> +       struct samsung_pin_bank *bank;
>> +       unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i < d->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank)
>> +               of_node_put(bank->of_node);
> 
> But "bank" variable wasn't actually assigned before, only declared?

Good point, bank has to be assigned just like in patch 2/24.

> 
>> +}
>> +

Best regards,
Krzysztof