Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] SoC changes for 5.17

[Florian Fainelli]

On 12/24/21 9:11 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Olof,
> 
> On 12/23/2021 13:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I'm sending out the pull requests for 5.17 early, as I won't have
>> access to
>> my workstation for the next two weeks. With only 760 non-merge commits,
>> this again feels quieter than the massive previous merge window, but the
>> number of changed lines was actually slightly higher.
>>
>> There are very few changes aside from devicetree patches, most of
>> which are for the i.MX, Tegra, Qualcomm, Apple, K3 and Aspeed
>> platforms.
>>
>> We have a couple of new SoCs in existing families:
>>
>>   - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1
>>   - Qualcomm Snapdragon SDX65
>>   - NXP i.MX8ULP
>>   - Texas Instruments j721s2
>>   - Renesas R-Car S4-8
>>
>> The time between product announcement and kernel support is fairly short
>> for all of these, which is nice. In particular the two Snapdragons
>> were only
>> announced this month and are the current high end of Qualcomm's products.
>> On the other end of the spectrum, we also add support for ST SPEAr320s,
>> which was launched 10 years ago.
>>
>> Aside from the Arm chips, there is also a pull request for a new
>> RISC-V SoC,
>> the Starfive JH7100, including some of the basic drivers to make it boot.
> 
> There seems to half of the submitted Broadcom SoCs pull request missing
> in this one, was there issues with those below:
> 
> defconfigs:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-1-f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-2-f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> 
> drivers:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-5-f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> 
> Should I resend or fix something in those? Thanks!


Arnd, Olof, do I need to resend the 3 pull requests mentioned above?
Thanks and happy new year.
-- 
Florian