Re: [PATCH net-next] net: lantiq_xrx200: add ingress SG DMA support

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue Jan 04 2022 - 12:41:29 EST



On 1/3/22 11:43, Aleksander Jan Bajkowski wrote:
This patch adds support for scatter gather DMA. DMA in PMAC splits
the packet into several buffers when the MTU on the CPU port is
less than the MTU of the switch. The first buffer starts at an
offset of NET_IP_ALIGN. In subsequent buffers, dma ignores the
offset. Thanks to this patch, the user can still connect to the
device in such a situation. For normal configurations, the patch
has no effect on performance.

Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@xxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
index 80bfaf2fec92..503fb99c5b90 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
#define XRX200_DMA_TX 1
#define XRX200_DMA_BURST_LEN 8
+#define XRX200_DMA_PACKET_COMPLETE 0
+#define XRX200_DMA_PACKET_IN_PROGRESS 1
+
/* cpu port mac */
#define PMAC_RX_IPG 0x0024
#define PMAC_RX_IPG_MASK 0xf
@@ -62,6 +65,9 @@ struct xrx200_chan {
struct ltq_dma_channel dma;
struct sk_buff *skb[LTQ_DESC_NUM];
+ struct sk_buff *skb_head;
+ struct sk_buff *skb_tail;
+
struct xrx200_priv *priv;
};
@@ -205,7 +211,8 @@ static int xrx200_hw_receive(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
struct xrx200_priv *priv = ch->priv;
struct ltq_dma_desc *desc = &ch->dma.desc_base[ch->dma.desc];
struct sk_buff *skb = ch->skb[ch->dma.desc];
- int len = (desc->ctl & LTQ_DMA_SIZE_MASK);
+ u32 ctl = desc->ctl;
+ int len = (ctl & LTQ_DMA_SIZE_MASK);
struct net_device *net_dev = priv->net_dev;
int ret;
@@ -221,12 +228,36 @@ static int xrx200_hw_receive(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
}
skb_put(skb, len);
- skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, net_dev);
- netif_receive_skb(skb);
- net_dev->stats.rx_packets++;
- net_dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
- return 0;
+ /* add buffers to skb via skb->frag_list */
+ if (ctl & LTQ_DMA_SOP) {
+ ch->skb_head = skb;
+ ch->skb_tail = skb;
+ } else if (ch->skb_head) {
+ if (ch->skb_head == ch->skb_tail)
+ skb_shinfo(ch->skb_tail)->frag_list = skb;
+ else
+ ch->skb_tail->next = skb;
+ ch->skb_tail = skb;
+ skb_reserve(ch->skb_tail, -NET_IP_ALIGN);
+ ch->skb_head->len += skb->len;
+ ch->skb_head->data_len += skb->len;
+ ch->skb_head->truesize += skb->truesize;
+ }
+
+ if (ctl & LTQ_DMA_EOP) {
+ ch->skb_head->protocol = eth_type_trans(ch->skb_head, net_dev);
+ netif_receive_skb(ch->skb_head);
+ net_dev->stats.rx_packets++;
+ net_dev->stats.rx_bytes += ch->skb_head->len;


Use after free alert.

Please add/test the following fix.

(It is illegal to deref skb after netif_receive_skb())


diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
index 503fb99c5b90..bf7e3c7910d1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
@@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ static int xrx200_hw_receive(struct xrx200_chan *ch)

        if (ctl & LTQ_DMA_EOP) {
                ch->skb_head->protocol = eth_type_trans(ch->skb_head, net_dev);
-               netif_receive_skb(ch->skb_head);
                net_dev->stats.rx_packets++;
                net_dev->stats.rx_bytes += ch->skb_head->len;
+               netif_receive_skb(ch->skb_head);
                ch->skb_head = NULL;
                ch->skb_tail = NULL;
                ret = XRX200_DMA_PACKET_COMPLETE;



+ ch->skb_head = NULL;
+ ch->skb_tail = NULL;
+ ret = XRX200_DMA_PACKET_COMPLETE;
+ } else {
+ ret = XRX200_DMA_PACKET_IN_PROGRESS;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
}
static int xrx200_poll_rx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
@@ -241,7 +272,9 @@ static int xrx200_poll_rx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if ((desc->ctl & (LTQ_DMA_OWN | LTQ_DMA_C)) == LTQ_DMA_C) {
ret = xrx200_hw_receive(ch);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret == XRX200_DMA_PACKET_IN_PROGRESS)
+ continue;
+ if (ret != XRX200_DMA_PACKET_COMPLETE)
return ret;
rx++;
} else {