Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals

From: Al Viro
Date: Mon Jan 03 2022 - 20:17:11 EST

Next message: Wei Yang: "[PATCH] mm: page->mapping folio->mapping should have the same offset"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[narmstrong-oxnas:oxnas/v5.10/sata 3/3] drivers/ata/sata_ox810se.c:1884:34: warning: format '%u' expects a matching 'unsigned int' argument"
In reply to: Walt Drummond: "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals"
Next in thread: Al Viro: "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:00:58PM -0800, Walt Drummond wrote:
> I simply wanted SIGINFO and VSTATUS, and that necessitated this.

Elaborate, please. What exactly requires more than 32 rt signals?

Next message: Wei Yang: "[PATCH] mm: page->mapping folio->mapping should have the same offset"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[narmstrong-oxnas:oxnas/v5.10/sata 3/3] drivers/ata/sata_ox810se.c:1884:34: warning: format '%u' expects a matching 'unsigned int' argument"
In reply to: Walt Drummond: "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals"
Next in thread: Al Viro: "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]