Re: [BUG] Page Fault in hci_inquiry_result_with_rssi_evt

From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Date: Mon Jan 03 2022 - 19:38:30 EST


Hi Sönke,

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:41 PM Sönke Huster <soenke.huster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While fuzzing bluetooth-next I found the following bug:
>
> [ 27.333034] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffff61a1a1a1a1a
> [ 27.333241] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 27.333241] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 27.333241] PGD 6dfd2067 P4D 6dfd2067 PUD 0
> [ 27.333241] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
> [ 27.333241] CPU: 0 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/u3:2 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1+ #81
> [ 27.333241] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> [ 27.333241] Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
> [ 27.333241] RIP: 0010:hci_inquiry_result_with_rssi_evt+0xbc/0x950
> [ 27.333241] Code: 8b 04 24 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 28 00 0f 85 20 07 00 00 48 8b 04 24 4c 8b 28 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 0
> [ 27.333241] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004ff9c8 EFLAGS: 00010212
> [ 27.333241] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000022 RCX: ffffffff834663d1
> [ 27.333241] RDX: 1ffffa1a1a1a1a1a RSI: 0000000000000012 RDI: ffff88800affb074
> [ 27.333241] RBP: ffff88800aae0000 R08: ffffffff844ef360 R09: ffffffff83487b35
> [ 27.333241] R10: 000000000000002c R11: 0000000000000022 R12: ffff88800affb000
> [ 27.333241] R13: ffffd0d0d0d0d0d0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88800aae0000
> [ 27.333241] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806ce00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 27.333241] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 27.333241] CR2: fffff61a1a1a1a1a CR3: 0000000004a26000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> [ 27.333241] Call Trace:
> [ 27.333241] <TASK>
> [ 27.333241] ? wait_for_completion_io+0x270/0x270
> [ 27.333241] ? hci_inquiry_result_evt+0x4b0/0x4b0
> [ 27.333241] hci_event_packet+0x3b11/0x7b10
> [ 27.333241] ? lock_chain_count+0x20/0x20
> [ 27.333241] ? hci_cmd_status_evt.constprop.0+0x4ea0/0x4ea0
> [ 27.333241] ? sysvec_reboot+0x50/0xc0
> [ 27.333241] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
> [ 27.333241] ? lock_release+0x3b2/0x6f0
> [ 27.333241] ? skb_dequeue+0x110/0x1a0
> [ 27.333241] ? mark_held_locks+0x9e/0xe0
> [ 27.333241] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x17b/0x400
> [ 27.333241] hci_rx_work+0x4d3/0xb90
> [ 27.333241] process_one_work+0x904/0x1590
> [ 27.333241] ? lock_release+0x6f0/0x6f0
> [ 27.333241] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230
> [ 27.333241] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
> [ 27.333241] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x41/0x50
> [ 27.333241] worker_thread+0x578/0x1310
> [ 27.333241] ? process_one_work+0x1590/0x1590
> [ 27.333241] kthread+0x3b2/0x490
> [ 27.333241] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x1f/0x40
> [ 27.333241] ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100
> [ 27.333241] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> [ 27.333241] </TASK>
> [ 27.333241] Modules linked in:
> [ 27.333241] CR2: fffff61a1a1a1a1a
> [ 27.333241] ---[ end trace 6a6825484c8fefa6 ]---
> [ 27.333241] RIP: 0010:hci_inquiry_result_with_rssi_evt+0xbc/0x950
> [ 27.333241] Code: 8b 04 24 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 28 00 0f 85 20 07 00 00 48 8b 04 24 4c 8b 28 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 0
> [ 27.333241] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004ff9c8 EFLAGS: 00010212
> [ 27.333241] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000022 RCX: ffffffff834663d1
> [ 27.333241] RDX: 1ffffa1a1a1a1a1a RSI: 0000000000000012 RDI: ffff88800affb074
> [ 27.333241] RBP: ffff88800aae0000 R08: ffffffff844ef360 R09: ffffffff83487b35
> [ 27.333241] R10: 000000000000002c R11: 0000000000000022 R12: ffff88800affb000
> [ 27.333241] R13: ffffd0d0d0d0d0d0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88800aae0000
> [ 27.333241] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806ce00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 27.333241] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 27.333241] CR2: fffff61a1a1a1a1a CR3: 0000000004a26000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> [ 27.379996] kworker/u3:2 (45) used greatest stack depth: 27736 bytes left
>
> It occurs when sending the following frame to the kernel:
>
> $ xxd crashes/hci_inquiry_result_with_rssi_evt
> 00000000: 0422 24d0 d0d0 d0d0 d0ff ff ."$........
>
> The bug was introduced with the commit "Bluetooth: HCI: Use skb_pull_data to parse Inquiry Result with RSSI event" (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git/commit/?id=8d08d324fdcb7).

That is pretty weird, the data seems to be the following:

04 -> HCI_EVENT_PKT
22 -> HCI_EV_INQUIRY_RESULT_WITH_RSSI
24 -> hci_ev_inquiry_result_rssi.num
d0 d0d0 d0d0 d0ff ff

But this should never evaluate to true for:

if (skb->len == flex_array_size(ev, res2->info, ev->res2->num)) {
...
} else if (skb->len == flex_array_size(ev, res1->info, ev->res1->num)) {

These requires the data to be multiple of sizeof(struct
inquiry_info_rssi_pscan) = 15 bytes or sizeof(struct
inquiry_info_rssi) = 14 bytes respectively where the data left is just
8 bytes long, besides with the number of entries being 0x24 this shall
be well beyond skb->len which shall have cause the else clause:

} else {
bt_dev_err(hdev, "Malformed HCI Event: 0x%2.2x",
HCI_EV_INQUIRY_RESULT_WITH_RSSI);
}

Anyway the bluetooth-next has been updated since last week so I first
attempt to reproduce with a fresh clone of it since we did some fixups
since then.

--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz