Fix repeated legacy kprobes on same function

From: Qiang Wang
Date: Thu Dec 23 2021 - 23:01:32 EST


If repeated legacy kprobes on same function in one process,
libbpf will register using the same probe name and got -EBUSY
error. So append index to the probe name format to fix this
problem.

And fix a bug in commit 46ed5fc33db9, which wrongly used the
func_name instead of probe_name to register.

Fixes: 46ed5fc33db9 ("libbpf: Refactor and simplify legacy kprobe code")
Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 7c74342bb668..7d1097958459 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -9634,7 +9634,8 @@ static int append_to_file(const char *file, const char *fmt, ...)
 static void gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(char *buf, size_t buf_sz,
                                         const char *kfunc_name, size_t offset)
 {
-       snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset);
+       static int index = 0;
+       snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx_%d", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset, index++);
 }

 static int add_kprobe_event_legacy(const char *probe_name, bool retprobe,
@@ -9735,7 +9736,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
                gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(probe_name, sizeof(probe_name),
                                             func_name, offset);

-               legacy_probe = strdup(func_name);
+               legacy_probe = strdup(probe_name);
                if (!legacy_probe)
                        return libbpf_err_ptr(-ENOMEM);

--
2.20.1