Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Driver for ON Semi AR0521 camera sensor

[Jacopo Mondi]

Hi Joe,
  sorry to jump in

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 08:06 +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> > The driver has been extensively tested in an i.MX6-based system.
> > AR0521 is a 5.7 mm x 4.3 mm, 5 MPix RGGB MIPI/HiSPi BSI CMOS sensor
> > from On Semiconductor.
>
> trivial notes:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c
> []
> > +/* External clock (extclk) frequencies */
> > +#define AR0521_EXTCLK_MIN	  (10 * 1000 * 1000)
>
> Generally, adding a prefix like AR0521_ to defines that are
> locally defined in a single file unnecessarily increases
> identifier length.
>
> It makes using short line lengths difficult.
>
> e.g. Using this identifier anywhere
>
> > +#define AR0521_REG_HISPI_CONTROL_STATUS_FRAMER_TEST_MODE_ENABLE 0x80
>
> Many of the 80 column line lengths and line wrapping used in this
> file are not really nice to read.  I believe you don't have to be
> strict about 80 column lines.
>

Krzysztof first version had much longer lines, and in facts it has
been asked by me to reduce them to 80 cols. The media subsystem
requires to validate patches with

        ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --max-line-length=80

We longly debated this and I believe it's now generally accepted to go
over 80 when it makes sense, but not regularly span to 120 cols like
in the previous version.

I think this 80-cols limit not being an hard limit anymore is doing
more worse than good, as each subsystem applies a different rule, and
I know how frustrating is for Krzysztof to be pushed in different
direction, as the same happened to me when I contributed to other
subsystems and I've been asked to span to 100 cols while I was trying
to stay in 80 no matter what.

Thanks
   j

> > +#define be		cpu_to_be16
>
> It's a pity there's no way to declare an array with all members
> having a specific endianness.  Making sure all elements in these
> arrays are declared with be() is tedious.
>
> > +#define AR0521_NUM_SUPPLIES ARRAY_SIZE(ar0521_supply_names)
>
> It's almost always better to use ARRAY_SIZE directly and not
> use a #define for the array size.
>
> > +static int ar0521_set_gains(struct ar0521_dev *sensor)
> > +{
> []
> > +	dev_dbg(&sensor->i2c_client->dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
> ftrace works and perhaps all the similar debug logging uses aren't
> really necessary.
>
>