Re: [PATCH 0/2] Devicetree support for UML

[Richard Weinberger]

Vincent,

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Vincent Whitchurch" <vincent.whitchurch@xxxxxxxx>
> An: "richard" <richard@xxxxxx>
> CC: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jeff Dike" <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "anton ivanov"
> <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kernel" <kernel@xxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "linux-um" <linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "devicetree" <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2021 11:23:57
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Devicetree support for UML

> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:13:03PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> > Von: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2021 21:56:50
>> > On Tue, 2021-12-21 at 21:55 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
>> >>   Depends on [n]: OF [=n]
>> >>   Selected by [y]:
>> >>   - UML [=y]
>> >> 
>> >> Please note that my UML config has CONFIG_OF=n.
>> >> 
>> > Hm. So maybe that needs to be
>> > 
>> >	select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE if OF
>> 
>> Yeah, IIRC arm and mips use such a pattern too.  Vincent, what do you
>> think?
> 
> Yes, that looks like the correct fix.  I've tested it and it works.  Do
> you prefer to fix it up locally or should I repost?

I'll fix it myself. :-)

Thanks,
//richard