Re: remove set_fs for UML

[Richard Weinberger]

Boris,

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "bp" <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> An: "hch" <hch@xxxxxx>
> CC: "richard" <richard@xxxxxx>, "anton ivanov" <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-um"
> <linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2021 14:55:39
> Betreff: Re: remove set_fs for UML

> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:17:53AM +0100, hch wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:05:03PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> > So far UML seems to work with these changes applied. :-)
>> > I have applied both patches to my UML tree for now, I assume x86 maintainers are
>> > fine with
>> > patch 1/2?
>> 
>> Looks like patch 1 needs this fixup for some configurations, where
>> pci.h doesn't get pulled into kvm by other means.
>> 
>> But we probably want an ACK from the x86 maintainers to be sure anyway..
> 
> I don't see why not so
> 
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Should I take the first one along with this hunk below?

Would be great!
When I'll drop "x86/mtrr: remove the mtrr_bp_init stub" from the UML tree.
 
Thanks,
//richard