Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/sgx: Add accounting for tracking overcommit

[Dave Hansen]

On 12/20/21 1:35 PM, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> Thanks for your more detailed explanation - I will take a look at the
> VM overcommit limits. Since obviously the original implementation did
> have a default value set, I had still a remaining specific question
> about your comments. Are you suggesting that there should not be a way
> to override any overcommit limit at all? So drop the parameter all
> together?

Yes, let's kill the exposed tunable.

We don't have any strong, practical need for it at the moment other than
paranoia.