Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] watchdog: max77620: add comment to clarify set_timeout procedure

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Tue Dec 21 2021 - 10:06:43 EST

Next message: Rafał Miłecki: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: expose NVMEM cells in sysfs"
Previous message: Jiri Olsa: "Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] perf arm64: inject missing frames if perf-record used "--call-graph=fp""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 12/11/21 12:34 PM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:

Clarify why we need to ping the watchdog before changing the timeout by
quoting the MAX77714 datasheet.

Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Next message: Rafał Miłecki: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: expose NVMEM cells in sysfs"
Previous message: Jiri Olsa: "Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] perf arm64: inject missing frames if perf-record used "--call-graph=fp""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]