[PATCH -next] scsi: efct: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

[Yang Yingliang]

A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.

Fixes: efac162a4e4d ("scsi: efct: Don't pass GFP_DMA to dma_alloc_coherent()")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c
index 7bb4f9aad2c8..7043a61d553d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ efc_els_io_alloc_size(struct efc_node *node, u32 reqlen, u32 rsplen)
 	/* now allocate DMA for request and response */
 	els->io.req.size = reqlen;
 	els->io.req.virt = dma_alloc_coherent(&efc->pci->dev, els->io.req.size,
-					      &els->io.req.phys, GFP_KERNEL);
+					      &els->io.req.phys, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!els->io.req.virt) {
 		mempool_free(els, efc->els_io_pool);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&node->els_ios_lock, flags);
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ efc_els_io_alloc_size(struct efc_node *node, u32 reqlen, u32 rsplen)
 
 	els->io.rsp.size = rsplen;
 	els->io.rsp.virt = dma_alloc_coherent(&efc->pci->dev, els->io.rsp.size,
-					      &els->io.rsp.phys, GFP_KERNEL);
+					      &els->io.rsp.phys, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!els->io.rsp.virt) {
 		dma_free_coherent(&efc->pci->dev, els->io.req.size,
 				  els->io.req.virt, els->io.req.phys);
-- 
2.25.1