Re: [PATCH] thermal: rcar_thermal: Use platform_get_irq_optional() to get the interrupt

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:29 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 18/12/2021 15:41, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
> > allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
> > when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
> > in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the
> > irq chaining.
> >
> > In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
> > code use platform_get_irq_optional().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dropping usage of platform_get_resource() was agreed based on
> > the discussion [0].
> >
> > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/
> > patch/20211209001056.29774-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Prabhakar
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> > index b49f04daaf47..e4c7bc1bf7ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> > @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       struct rcar_thermal_common *common;
> >       struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
> >       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > -     struct resource *res, *irq;
> > +     struct resource *res;
> >       const struct rcar_thermal_chip *chip = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> >       int mres = 0;
> >       int i;
> > @@ -467,9 +467,16 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> >
> >       for (i = 0; i < chip->nirqs; i++) {
> > -             irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i);
> > -             if (!irq)
> > +             int irq;
> > +
> > +             irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, i);
> > +             if (irq <= 0 && irq != -ENXIO) {
> > +                     ret = irq ? irq : -ENXIO;
> > +                     goto error_unregister;
> > +             }
> > +             if (irq == -ENXIO)
> >                       continue;
>
> Why not invert the conditions?
>
>                 if (irq == -ENXIO)
>                         continue;

And this can be break.

>
>                 if (irq <= 0) {
>                         ret = irq ? irq : -ENXIO;

irq == 0 cannot happen.

>                         goto out_unregister;
>                 }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds