Re: [PATCH v2 06/17] dt-bindings: rng: add bindings for microchip mpfs rng

[Conor.Dooley]

On 17/12/2021 15:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 17/12/2021 15:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/12/2021 10:33, conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add device tree bindings for the hardware rng device accessed via
>>> the system services on the Microchip PolarFire SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/rng/microchip,mpfs-rng.yaml      | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/microchip,mpfs-rng.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/microchip,mpfs-rng.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/microchip,mpfs-rng.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..32cbc37c9292
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/microchip,mpfs-rng.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/rng/microchip,mpfs-rng.yaml#";
>>> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#";
>>> +
>>> +title: Microchip MPFS random number generator
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> +  The hardware random number generator on the Polarfire SoC is
>>> +  accessed via the mailbox interface provided by the system controller
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: microchip,mpfs-rng
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +    hwrandom: hwrandom {
>>
>> Three topics:
>> 1. Node name (as most of others are using): rng
>> 2. skip the label, not helping in example.
>> 3. This looks very simple, so I wonder if the bindings are complete. No
>> IO space/address... How is it going to be instantiated?
>>
> 
> OK, now I saw the usage in DTS. I have doubts this makes sense as
> separate bindings. It looks like integrated part of syscontroller, so
> maybe make it part of that binding? Or at least add ref to syscontroller
> bindings that such child is expected.
Acking the rest of this, re: adding the ref: is what is being done in 
patch 03/17 insufficient?
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>