Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: Introduce CLK_ASSUME_ENABLED_WHEN_UNUSED

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-12-02 19:54:35)
> Some clock implementations doesn't provide means of implementing
> is_enabled(), but still requires to be explicitly disabled when found
> unused as part of clk_disable_unused().
> 
> One such set of clocks are Qualcomm's display RCGs. These can be enabled
> and disabled automatically by the hardware, so it's not possible to
> reliably query their configuration. Further more, these clocks need to
> be disabled when unused, to allow them to be "parked" onto a safe
> parent. Failure to disable the RCG results in the hardware locking up as
> clk_disable_unused() traverses up the tree and turns off its source
> clocks.
> 
> Add a new flag, CLK_ASSUME_ENABLED_BOOT, which clock drivers can use to
> signal that these clocks should be disabled even if they don't implement
> the is_enabled() ops.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

I'm inclined to remove the disable unused logic. It is the main cause of
problems in the clk framework and with android pushing everyone to use
modules it's become a more broken design in need of an actual fix.  The
best approach is probably to just rip it out and start over, kicking off
the process for someone to fix the power regression of any clks that are
left enabled at boot. Or we can take the regulator approach and delay
disabling for 30 seconds and keep it around.

I'd prefer we take the approach of parking clks at init instead as
Dmitry proposed. It will break continuous splash screen but I don't
think that's being used anyway?