Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] dt-bindings: Add bindings for peci-aspeed

From: Billy Tsai
Date: Tue Dec 07 2021 - 21:23:30 EST



Hi Iwona,

On 2021/12/8, 2:30 AM, "Winiarska, Iwona" <iwona.winiarska@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 02:31 +0000, Billy Tsai wrote:
> > Hi Zev,
> >
> > On 2021/12/2, 9:55 AM, "Zev Weiss" <zweiss@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:38:04AM PST, Billy Tsai wrote:
> > > >Hi,
> > > >
> > > >On 2021/11/23, 10:10 PM, "openbmc on behalf of Iwona Winiarska"
> > <openbmc-bounces+billy_tsai=aspeedtech.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
> > iwona.winiarska@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add device tree bindings for the peci-aspeed controller driver.
> > > >
> > > > > + aspeed,clock-divider:
> > > > > + description:
> > > > > + This value determines PECI controller internal clock
> > dividing
> > > > > + rate. The divider will be calculated as 2 raised to
> > the power of
> > > > > + the given value.
> > > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > > > + minimum: 0
> > > > > + maximum: 7
> > > > > + default: 0
> > > > > +
> > > > > + aspeed,msg-timing:
> > > > > + description:
> > > > > + Message timing negotiation period. This value will
> > determine the period
> > > > > + of message timing negotiation to be issued by PECI
> > controller. The unit
> > > > > + of the programmed value is four times of PECI clock
> > period.
> > > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > > > + minimum: 0
> > > > > + maximum: 255
> > > > > + default: 1
> > > > > +
> > > > > + aspeed,addr-timing:
> > > > > + description:
> > > > > + Address timing negotiation period. This value will
> > determine the period
> > > > > + of address timing negotiation to be issued by PECI
> > controller. The unit
> > > > > + of the programmed value is four times of PECI clock
> > period.
> > > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > > > + minimum: 0
> > > > > + maximum: 255
> > > > > + default: 1
> > > >I suggest deleting these three properties and replacing them with the
> > following
> > > >
> > > >aspeed,peci-bit-time:
> > > > description:
> > > > The bit time driven by PECI controller. The unit of the
> > value is Hz.
> > > > minimum: 2000
> > > > maximum: 1000000
> > > >
> > > >And the driver should use this property to caculate the appropriate
> > clock-divider,
> > > >msg-timing and addr-timing, instead of exposing hardware registers to
> > dts.
> > > >
> >
> > > Or perhaps just 'bus-frequency' a la i2c-aspeed, gpio-aspeed-sgpio,
> > etc?
> >
> > It's a good ideal for the consistency.

> If we want to go with passing frequency - I would prefer to go with "clock-
> frequency" and use clock framework for exposing it to peci-aspeed (as I
> mentioned in reply to patch 05).

> What do you think?

Good.
It looks that "clock-frequency" is more common usage.

Thanks

Best Regards,
Billy Tsai