Re: [PATCH v3] mm: fix panic in __alloc_pages

[Michal Hocko]

On Tue 07-12-21 12:08:57, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 07.12.21 11:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I didn't have much time to dive into this deeper and I have hit some
> > problems handling this in an arch specific code so I have tried to play
> > with this instead:
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index c5952749ad40..4d71759d0d9b 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -8032,8 +8032,16 @@ void __init free_area_init(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
> >  	/* Initialise every node */
> >  	mminit_verify_pageflags_layout();
> >  	setup_nr_node_ids();
> > -	for_each_online_node(nid) {
> > +	for_each_node(nid) {
> >  		pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> > +
> > +		if (!node_online(nid)) {
> > +			pr_warn("Node %d uninitialized by the platform. Please report with memory map.\n");
> > +			alloc_node_data(nid);
> 
> That's x86 specific and not exposed to generic code -- at least in my
> code base. I think we'd want an arch_alloc_nodedata() variant that
> allocates via memblock -- and initializes all fields to 0. So
> essentially a generic alloc_node_data().

you are right

> 
> > +			free_area_init_memoryless_node(nid);
> 
> That's really just free_area_init_node() below, I do wonder what value
> free_area_init_memoryless_node() has as of today.

I am not sure there is any real value in having this special name for
this but I have kept is sync with what x86 does currently. If we want to
remove the wrapper then just do it everywhere. I can do that on top.

> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		free_area_init_node(nid);
> >  
> >  		/* Any memory on that node */
> > 
> > Could you give it a try? I do not have any machine which would exhibit
> > the problem so I cannot really test this out. I hope build_zone_info
> > will not choke on this. I assume the node distance table is
> > uninitialized for these nodes and IIUC this should lead to an assumption
> > that all other nodes are close. But who knows that can blow up there.
> > 
> > Btw. does this make any sense at all to others?
> > 
> 
> __build_all_zonelists() has to update the zonelists of all nodes I think.

I am not sure what you mean. This should be achieved by this patch
because the boot time build_all_zonelists will go over all online nodes
(i.e. with pgdat). free_area_init happens before that. I am just worried
that the arch specific node_distance() will generate a complete garbage
or blow up for some reason.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs