Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] modpost: file2alias: fixup mdio alias garbled code in modules.alias

From: zhuyinbo
Date: Tue Dec 07 2021 - 04:42:14 EST




在 2021/12/1 上午8:38, Andrew Lunn 写道:
However, this won't work for PHY devices created _before_ the kernel
has mounted the rootfs, whether or not they end up being used. So,
every PHY mentioned in DT will be created before the rootfs is mounted,
and none of these PHYs will have their modules loaded.

Hi Russell

I think what you are saying here is, if the MAC or MDIO bus driver is
built in, the PHY driver also needs to be built in?

If the MAC or MDIO bus driver is a module, it means the rootfs has
already been mounted in order to get these modules. And so the PHY
driver as a module will also work.

I believe this is the root cause of Yinbo Zhu's issue.

I think you should be right and I had did lots of test but use rquest_module it doesn't load marvell module, and dts does't include any phy node. even though I was use "marvell" as input's args of request_module.

You are speculating that in Yinbo Zhu case, the MAC driver is built
in, the PHY is a module. The initial request for the firmware fails.
Yinbo Zhu would like udev to try again later when the modules are
available.

What we _could_ do is review all device trees and PHY drivers to see
whether DT modaliases are ever used for module loading. If they aren't,
then we _could_ make the modalias published by the kernel conditional
on the type of mdio device - continue with the DT approach for non-PHY
devices, and switch to the mdio: scheme for PHY devices. I repeat, this
can only happen if no PHY drivers match using the DT scheme, otherwise
making this change _will_ cause a regression.


Take a look at
drivers/net/mdio/of_mdio.c:whitelist_phys[] and the comment above it.

So there are some DT blobs out there with compatible strings for
PHYs. I've no idea if they actually load that way, or the standard PHY
mechanism is used.

Andrew



> That is not true universally for all MDIO though - as
> xilinx_gmii2rgmii.c clearly shows. That is a MDIO driver which uses DT
> the compatible string to do the module load. So, we have proof there
> that Yinbo Zhu's change will definitely cause a regression which we
> can not allow.

I don't understand that what you said about regression. My patch doesn't cause xilinx_gmii2rgmii.c driver load fail, in this time that do_of_table and platform_uevent will be responsible "of" type driver auto load and my patch was responsible for "mdio" type driver auto load,
In default code. There are request_module to load phy driver, but as Russell King said that request_module doesn't garantee auto load will always work well, but udev mechanism can garantee it. and udev mechaism is more mainstream, otherwise mdio_uevent is useless. if use udev mechanism that my patch was needed. and if apply my patch it doesn't cause request_module mechaism work bad because I will add following change:



- ret = request_module(MDIO_MODULE_PREFIX MDIO_ID_FMT,
- MDIO_ID_ARGS(phy_id));
+ ret = request_module(MDIO_MODULE_PREFIX MDIO_ID_FMT, phy_id);
/* We only check for failures in executing the usermode binary,
* not whether a PHY driver module exists for the PHY ID.
* Accept -ENOENT because this may occur in case no initramfs exists,
diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
index 7bd23bf..bc6ea0d 100644
--- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
+++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
@@ -600,16 +600,7 @@ struct platform_device_id {
#define MDIO_NAME_SIZE 32
#define MDIO_MODULE_PREFIX "mdio:"

-#define MDIO_ID_FMT "%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u%u"
-#define MDIO_ID_ARGS(_id) \
- ((_id)>>31) & 1, ((_id)>>30) & 1, ((_id)>>29) & 1, ((_id)>>28) & 1, \
- ((_id)>>27) & 1, ((_id)>>26) & 1, ((_id)>>25) & 1, ((_id)>>24) & 1, \
- ((_id)>>23) & 1, ((_id)>>22) & 1, ((_id)>>21) & 1, ((_id)>>20) & 1, \
- ((_id)>>19) & 1, ((_id)>>18) & 1, ((_id)>>17) & 1, ((_id)>>16) & 1, \
- ((_id)>>15) & 1, ((_id)>>14) & 1, ((_id)>>13) & 1, ((_id)>>12) & 1, \
- ((_id)>>11) & 1, ((_id)>>10) & 1, ((_id)>>9) & 1, ((_id)>>8) & 1, \
- ((_id)>>7) & 1, ((_id)>>6) & 1, ((_id)>>5) & 1, ((_id)>>4) & 1, \
- ((_id)>>3) & 1, ((_id)>>2) & 1, ((_id)>>1) & 1, (_id) & 1
+#define MDIO_ID_FMT "p%08x"