Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: use a delayed worker for led updates

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:04:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This was confusing becuase it should have been [PATCH 4/4 v2].  These
> days I think the prefered way is to just resend the whole series as a
> new thread.
> 
> Greg doesn't use patchwork, but these rules especially apply for
> subsystems which use patchwork.  People say that patchwork gets confused
> when people use the --in-reply-to option and I guess it's hard to
> apply individual patches in patchwork?  Anyway, just always start a new
> thread and resend everything.
> 
> Send a reply to the original thread to say "Don't apply this one, it has
> sleeping in atomic bugs", otherwise it might get applied by mistake.

I had already reverted that patch from my tree, so I would not have
applied it again :)

thanks,

greg k-h