Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Move chip specific functions to right files
From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
Date: Wed Dec 01 2021 - 09:40:36 EST
On 12/1/2021 4:11 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
Thanks for your time Srini!!!
On 29/11/2021 09:58, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
Update lpass lpi pin control driver to accommodate new lpass variant
SoC specific drivers.
Move sm8250 SoC specific functions to pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c file
and common declarations to pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h header file.
Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 251
+-----------------------
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h | 139 +++++++++++++
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c | 125 ++++++++++++
4 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 245 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
index 7a12e8c..74568cf 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
@@ -37,3 +37,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SM8150) += pinctrl-sm8150.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SM8250) += pinctrl-sm8250.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SM8350) += pinctrl-sm8350.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI) += pinctrl-lpass-lpi.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI) += pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.o
This is confusing, either we make new
CONFIG_PINCTRL_SM8250_LPASS_LPI here and use it for
pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.o
Okay. Will add new config macro. Thought of changing it, but worried
that existing platforms may get disturbed.
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
index 2f19ab4..2641489 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
@@ -4,237 +4,16 @@
* Copyright (c) 2020 Linaro Ltd.
*/
-#include <linux/bitops.h>
-#include <linux/bitfield.h>
Looks like some of these are removed without a reason.
Actually, as functions distributed to different files, moved few of them
to corresponding files,
and observed few of them are not required. could you please suggest on this?
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
-#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
-#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/types.h>
#include "../core.h"
#include "../pinctrl-utils.h"
+#include "pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h"
...
-
-module_platform_driver(lpi_pinctrl_driver);
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI LPI GPIO pin control driver");
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
if you build this as Modules your build would fail without
MODULE_LICENSE().
Okay. Will change accordingly.
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b0afb40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2016-2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 Linaro Ltd.
+ */
+#ifndef __PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI_H__
+#define __PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI_H__
+
+#define LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG 0xa000
+#define LPI_TLMM_REG_OFFSET 0x1000
+#define LPI_SLEW_RATE_MAX 0x03
+#define LPI_SLEW_BITS_SIZE 0x02
+#define LPI_SLEW_RATE_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define LPI_GPIO_CFG_REG 0x00
+#define LPI_GPIO_PULL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define LPI_GPIO_FUNCTION_MASK GENMASK(5, 2)
+#define LPI_GPIO_OUT_STRENGTH_MASK GENMASK(8, 6)
+#define LPI_GPIO_OE_MASK BIT(9)
+#define LPI_GPIO_VALUE_REG 0x04
+#define LPI_GPIO_VALUE_IN_MASK BIT(0)
+#define LPI_GPIO_VALUE_OUT_MASK BIT(1)
+
+#define LPI_GPIO_BIAS_DISABLE 0x0
+#define LPI_GPIO_PULL_DOWN 0x1
+#define LPI_GPIO_KEEPER 0x2
+#define LPI_GPIO_PULL_UP 0x3
+#define LPI_GPIO_DS_TO_VAL(v) (v / 2 - 1)
+#define NO_SLEW -1
+
+#define LPI_FUNCTION(fname) \
+ [LPI_MUX_##fname] = { \
+ .name = #fname, \
+ .groups = fname##_groups, \
+ .ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(fname##_groups), \
+ }
+
+#define LPI_PINGROUP(id, soff, f1, f2, f3, f4) \
+ { \
+ .name = "gpio" #id, \
+ .pins = gpio##id##_pins, \
+ .pin = id, \
+ .slew_offset = soff, \
+ .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio##id##_pins), \
+ .funcs = (int[]){ \
+ LPI_MUX_gpio, \
+ LPI_MUX_##f1, \
+ LPI_MUX_##f2, \
+ LPI_MUX_##f3, \
+ LPI_MUX_##f4, \
+ }, \
+ .nfuncs = 5, \
+ }
+
+struct lpi_pingroup {
+ const char *name;
+ const unsigned int *pins;
+ unsigned int npins;
+ unsigned int pin;
+ /* Bit offset in slew register for SoundWire pins only */
+ int slew_offset;
+ unsigned int *funcs;
+ unsigned int nfuncs;
+};
+
+struct lpi_function {
+ const char *name;
+ const char * const *groups;
+ unsigned int ngroups;
+};
+
+struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data {
+ const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
+ int npins;
+ const struct lpi_pingroup *groups;
+ int ngroups;
+ const struct lpi_function *functions;
+ int nfunctions;
+};
+
+#define MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS 2
+
+struct lpi_pinctrl {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *ctrl;
+ struct gpio_chip chip;
+ struct pinctrl_desc desc;
+ char __iomem *tlmm_base;
+ char __iomem *slew_base;
+ struct clk_bulk_data clks[MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS];
+ struct mutex slew_access_lock;
+ const struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data *data;
+};
+
From here
<<<
+enum lpass_lpi_functions {
+ LPI_MUX_dmic1_clk,
+ LPI_MUX_dmic1_data,
+ LPI_MUX_dmic2_clk,
+ LPI_MUX_dmic2_data,
+ LPI_MUX_dmic3_clk,
+ LPI_MUX_dmic3_data,
+ LPI_MUX_i2s1_clk,
+ LPI_MUX_i2s1_data,
+ LPI_MUX_i2s1_ws,
+ LPI_MUX_i2s2_clk,
+ LPI_MUX_i2s2_data,
+ LPI_MUX_i2s2_ws,
+ LPI_MUX_qua_mi2s_data,
+ LPI_MUX_qua_mi2s_sclk,
+ LPI_MUX_qua_mi2s_ws,
+ LPI_MUX_swr_rx_clk,
+ LPI_MUX_swr_rx_data,
+ LPI_MUX_swr_tx_clk,
+ LPI_MUX_swr_tx_data,
+ LPI_MUX_wsa_swr_clk,
+ LPI_MUX_wsa_swr_data,
+ LPI_MUX_gpio,
+ LPI_MUX__,
+};
+
+static const unsigned int gpio0_pins[] = { 0 };
+static const unsigned int gpio1_pins[] = { 1 };
+static const unsigned int gpio2_pins[] = { 2 };
+static const unsigned int gpio3_pins[] = { 3 };
+static const unsigned int gpio4_pins[] = { 4 };
+static const unsigned int gpio5_pins[] = { 5 };
+static const unsigned int gpio6_pins[] = { 6 };
+static const unsigned int gpio7_pins[] = { 7 };
+static const unsigned int gpio8_pins[] = { 8 };
+static const unsigned int gpio9_pins[] = { 9 };
+static const unsigned int gpio10_pins[] = { 10 };
+static const unsigned int gpio11_pins[] = { 11 };
+static const unsigned int gpio12_pins[] = { 12 };
+static const unsigned int gpio13_pins[] = { 13 };
>>>
to here are specific to sm8250, so it should not be in header file to
start with.
As these are common to all lpass variants.. I feel it's better to keep
in Header file.
And if new pins comes in later variants, we can add them incrementally,
and they will not impact existing pin numbers.
I think in upcoming variants number of pins will not decrease.
+
+int lpi_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
+int lpi_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
+
+#endif /*__PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI_H__*/
+
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c
b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3eba8b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
...
+
+static struct platform_driver lpi_pinctrl_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "qcom-sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl",
+ .of_match_table = lpi_pinctrl_of_match,
+ },
+ .probe = lpi_pinctrl_probe,
+ .remove = lpi_pinctrl_remove,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(lpi_pinctrl_driver);
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI LPI GPIO pin control driver");
may be :
"SM8250 LPI GPIO pin control driver"
Okay.. will change accordingly.
--srini
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.