Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 07:46:42AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/12/21 8:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > > + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information
> > > > 
> > > > Preferably:   "I2C"
> > > 
> > > Why?
> > 
> > See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv:
> > > > like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree.
> > 
> > 
> > > UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the
> > > proper form of the abbreviation (*).
> > > 
> > > *) Check UM10204.pdf.
> 
> 
> > > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
> > 
> > Wolfram, what do you prefer?
> 
> > I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce
> > I2C nor I²C.
> 
> OK, let's leave it as Andy sent it then.
> 
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunla@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
Wolfram, can it be applied now or should I resend?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko