Re: [PATCH] perf hist: Fix memory leak of a perf_hpp_fmt

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Thu Nov 18 2021 - 08:16:36 EST


Em Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 01:28:11PM +0530, kajoljain escreveu:
>
>
> On 11/18/21 12:42 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > perf_hpp__column_unregister removes an entry from a list but doesn't
> > free the memory causing a memory leak spotted by leak sanitizer. Add the
> > free while at the same time reducing the scope of the function to
> > static.
>
> Patch looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain<kjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo


> Thanks,
> Kajol jain
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > tools/perf/util/hist.h | 1 -
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> > index c1f24d004852..5075ecead5f3 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> > @@ -535,6 +535,18 @@ struct perf_hpp_list perf_hpp_list = {
> > #undef __HPP_SORT_ACC_FN
> > #undef __HPP_SORT_RAW_FN
> >
> > +static void fmt_free(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * At this point fmt should be completely
> > + * unhooked, if not it's a bug.
> > + */
> > + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fmt->list));
> > + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fmt->sort_list));
> > +
> > + if (fmt->free)
> > + fmt->free(fmt);
> > +}
> >
> > void perf_hpp__init(void)
> > {
> > @@ -598,9 +610,10 @@ void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
> > list_add(&format->sort_list, &list->sorts);
> > }
> >
> > -void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
> > +static void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
> > {
> > list_del_init(&format->list);
> > + fmt_free(format);
> > }
> >
> > void perf_hpp__cancel_cumulate(void)
> > @@ -672,19 +685,6 @@ void perf_hpp__append_sort_keys(struct perf_hpp_list *list)
> > }
> >
> >
> > -static void fmt_free(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt)
> > -{
> > - /*
> > - * At this point fmt should be completely
> > - * unhooked, if not it's a bug.
> > - */
> > - BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fmt->list));
> > - BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fmt->sort_list));
> > -
> > - if (fmt->free)
> > - fmt->free(fmt);
> > -}
> > -
> > void perf_hpp__reset_output_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list)
> > {
> > struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt, *tmp;
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> > index 5343b62476e6..621f35ae1efa 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> > @@ -369,7 +369,6 @@ enum {
> > };
> >
> > void perf_hpp__init(void);
> > -void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
> > void perf_hpp__cancel_cumulate(void);
> > void perf_hpp__setup_output_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list);
> > void perf_hpp__reset_output_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list);
> >

--

- Arnaldo