Re: [PATCH V2] pwm: Use div64_ul instead of do_div

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:46:53PM +0000, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division. If the divisor is unsigned long, using
> div64_ul can avoid truncation to 32-bit.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c
> index a43b2babc809..1ae3d73b9832 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  				return -EINVAL;
>  
>  			clk_period_ns = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 256;
> -			do_div(clk_period_ns, clk_freq);
> +			clk_period_ns = div64_ul(clk_period_ns, clk_freq);
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Errata: cannot use slow clk on some IP revisions */
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  				return -EINVAL;
>  
>  			clk_period_ns = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 256;
> -			do_div(clk_period_ns, clk_freq);
> +			clk_period_ns = div64_ul(clk_period_ns, clk_freq);

The code change is good now, the commit log is as confusing as in v1.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature