Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Enroll kernel keys thru MOK

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 09:50 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 11:39 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:24:52PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 11:18 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > > I have included  a link to the mokutil [5] changes I have made to support 
> > > > > > this new functionality.  The shim changes have now been accepted
> > > > > > upstream [6].
> > > > 
> > > > ..snip..
> > > > > > [6] https://github.com/rhboot/shim/commit/4e513405b4f1641710115780d19dcec130c5208f
> > > > 
> > > > ..snip..
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does shim have the necessary features in a release?
> > > > 
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > It has been accepted in the upstream shim. If you are looking
> > > > for a distribution having rolled out a shim with this feature (so signed
> > > > by MSF) I fear that distributions are not that fast with shim releases.
>          ~~~
> 
> Should that be MS, or what does MSF mean?
> 
> > > > 
> > > > Also these:
> > > > https://github.com/rhboot/shim/pulls
> > > > https://github.com/rhboot/shim/issues
> > > > 
> > > > do mean some extra work would need to go in before an official
> > > > release is cut.
> > > > 
> > > > Hope this helps?
> > > 
> > > Yes. I'll hold with this up until there is an official release. Thank you.
> > 
> > Not sure I understand - but what are the concerns you have with shim
> > code that has been accepted?
> 
> Maybe my concern is that none of the patches have a tested-by?
> 
> Probably would be easier to get a test coverage, e.g. for people like
> me who do not even know how to self-compile Shim, how to setup user
> space using the product and so forth.
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

for the end product

/Jarkko