Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev

[Randy Dunlap]

On 11/12/21 8:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information
> > >
> > > Preferably:   "I2C"
> >
> > Why?
>
> See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv:
> > > like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree.
>
>
> > UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the
> > proper form of the abbreviation (*).
> >
> > *) Check UM10204.pdf.


> > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
>
> Wolfram, what do you prefer?

> I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce
> I2C nor I²C.

OK, let's leave it as Andy sent it then.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunla@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


--
~Randy