[irqchip: irq/irqchip-fixes] of/irq: Don't ignore interrupt-controller when interrupt-map failed

From: irqchip-bot for Marc Zyngier
Date: Fri Nov 12 2021 - 11:15:04 EST


The following commit has been merged into the irq/irqchip-fixes branch of irqchip:

Commit-ID: 10a20b34d735fb4a4af067919b9c0a1c870dac99
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms/10a20b34d735fb4a4af067919b9c0a1c870dac99
Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:10:39
Committer: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 16:10:00

of/irq: Don't ignore interrupt-controller when interrupt-map failed

Since 041284181226 ("of/irq: Allow matching of an interrupt-map local
to an interrupt controller"), the irq code favors using an interrupt-map
over a interrupt-controller property if both are available, while the
earlier behaviour was to ignore the interrupt-map altogether.

However, we now end-up with the opposite behaviour, which is to
ignore the interrupt-controller property even if the interrupt-map
fails to match its input. This new behaviour breaks the AmigaOne
X1000 machine, which ships with an extremely "creative" (read:
broken) device tree.

Fix this by allowing the interrupt-controller property to be selected
when interrupt-map fails to match anything.

Fixes: 041284181226 ("of/irq: Allow matching of an interrupt-map local to an interrupt controller")
Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/78308692-02e6-9544-4035-3171a8e1e6d4@xxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211112143644.434995-1-maz@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/of/irq.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
index 32be5a0..b10f015 100644
--- a/drivers/of/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
@@ -161,9 +161,10 @@ int of_irq_parse_raw(const __be32 *addr, struct of_phandle_args *out_irq)
* if it is then we are done, unless there is an
* interrupt-map which takes precedence.
*/
+ bool intc = of_property_read_bool(ipar, "interrupt-controller");
+
imap = of_get_property(ipar, "interrupt-map", &imaplen);
- if (imap == NULL &&
- of_property_read_bool(ipar, "interrupt-controller")) {
+ if (imap == NULL && intc) {
pr_debug(" -> got it !\n");
return 0;
}
@@ -244,8 +245,20 @@ int of_irq_parse_raw(const __be32 *addr, struct of_phandle_args *out_irq)

pr_debug(" -> imaplen=%d\n", imaplen);
}
- if (!match)
+ if (!match) {
+ if (intc) {
+ /*
+ * The PASEMI Nemo is a known offender, so
+ * let's only warn for anyone else.
+ */
+ WARN(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_PASEMI),
+ "%pOF interrupt-map failed, using interrupt-controller\n",
+ ipar);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
goto fail;
+ }

/*
* Successfully parsed an interrrupt-map translation; copy new