Re: [PATCH 7/7] net: dsa: b53: Expose PTP timestamping ioctls to userspace

From: Richard Cochran
Date: Mon Nov 08 2021 - 09:48:32 EST


On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 04:27:03PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 06:05:34AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > switch (cfg.rx_filter) {
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE:
> > break;
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_SYNC:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_DELAY_REQ:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NTP_ALL:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_EVENT:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_SYNC:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_DELAY_REQ:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_SYNC:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_DELAY_REQ:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_DELAY_REQ:
> > cfg.rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT;
> > break;
> > default:
> > mutex_unlock(&ocelot->ptp_lock);
> > return -ERANGE;
> > }
> >
> > That is essentially an upgrade to HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT. The
> > change from ALL to HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT is probably a simple
> > oversight, and the driver can be easily fixed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard
>
> It's essentially the same pattern as what Martin is introducing for b53.

Uh, no it isn't. The present patch has:

+ case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT:
+ case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_SYNC:
+ case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_DELAY_REQ:
+ case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT:
+ case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC:
+ case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_DELAY_REQ:
+ case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL:
+ config->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT;

There is an important difference between
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT and HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT

Notice the "L2" in there.

Thanks,
Richard