Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source

[Codrin.Ciubotariu]

On 05.11.2021 23:47, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently
>> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes
>> are required.
> 
> Not even patch 1/2?
> 

we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split.

Best regards,
Codrin