Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] rpmsg: create the rpmsg class in core instead of in rpmsg char

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Mon Nov 01 2021 - 12:57:13 EST


On Fri 22 Oct 07:54 CDT 2021, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:

> Migrate the creation of the rpmsg class from the rpmsg_char
> to the core that the class is usable by all rpmsg services.
>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 14 ++------------
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/rpmsg.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> index 941c5c54dd72..327ed739a3a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
> #define RPMSG_DEV_MAX (MINORMASK + 1)
>
> static dev_t rpmsg_major;
> -static struct class *rpmsg_class;
>
> static DEFINE_IDA(rpmsg_ctrl_ida);
> static DEFINE_IDA(rpmsg_ept_ida);
> @@ -362,7 +361,7 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent
> init_waitqueue_head(&eptdev->readq);
>
> device_initialize(dev);
> - dev->class = rpmsg_class;
> + dev->class = rpmsg_get_class();
> dev->parent = parent;
> dev->groups = rpmsg_eptdev_groups;
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, eptdev);
> @@ -482,7 +481,7 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> dev = &ctrldev->dev;
> device_initialize(dev);
> dev->parent = &rpdev->dev;
> - dev->class = rpmsg_class;
> + dev->class = rpmsg_get_class();
>
> cdev_init(&ctrldev->cdev, &rpmsg_ctrldev_fops);
> ctrldev->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> @@ -558,17 +557,9 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_init(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - rpmsg_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "rpmsg");
> - if (IS_ERR(rpmsg_class)) {
> - pr_err("failed to create rpmsg class\n");
> - unregister_chrdev_region(rpmsg_major, RPMSG_DEV_MAX);
> - return PTR_ERR(rpmsg_class);
> - }
> -
> ret = register_rpmsg_driver(&rpmsg_chrdev_driver);
> if (ret < 0) {
> pr_err("rpmsgchr: failed to register rpmsg driver\n");
> - class_destroy(rpmsg_class);
> unregister_chrdev_region(rpmsg_major, RPMSG_DEV_MAX);
> }
>
> @@ -579,7 +570,6 @@ postcore_initcall(rpmsg_chrdev_init);
> static void rpmsg_chrdev_exit(void)
> {
> unregister_rpmsg_driver(&rpmsg_chrdev_driver);
> - class_destroy(rpmsg_class);
> unregister_chrdev_region(rpmsg_major, RPMSG_DEV_MAX);
> }
> module_exit(rpmsg_chrdev_exit);
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> index 9151836190ce..53162038254d 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>
> #include "rpmsg_internal.h"
>
> +static struct class *rpmsg_class;
> +
> /**
> * rpmsg_create_channel() - create a new rpmsg channel
> * using its name and address info.
> @@ -296,6 +298,19 @@ __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_poll);
>
> +/**
> + * rpmsg_get_class() - get reference to the sysfs rpmsg class
> + *
> + * This function return the pointer to the "rpmsg" class created by the rpmsg core.
> + *
> + * Returns the struct class pointer
> + */
> +struct class *rpmsg_get_class(void)

What value does this helper function add? Can't we just expose
rpmsg_class directly?

> +{
> + return rpmsg_class;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_get_class);
> +
> /**
> * rpmsg_trysend_offchannel() - send a message using explicit src/dst addresses
> * @ept: the rpmsg endpoint
> @@ -629,10 +644,17 @@ static int __init rpmsg_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + rpmsg_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "rpmsg");
> + if (IS_ERR(rpmsg_class)) {
> + pr_err("failed to create rpmsg class\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(rpmsg_class);
> + }
> +
> ret = bus_register(&rpmsg_bus);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> pr_err("failed to register rpmsg bus: %d\n", ret);
> -
> + class_destroy(rpmsg_class);
> + }
> return ret;
> }
> postcore_initcall(rpmsg_init);
> diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg.h b/include/linux/rpmsg.h

Isn't this just going to be used by rpmsg_char and rpmsg_ctrl? Do we
really need to expose it in the client-facing API?

Regards,
Bjorn

> index a8dcf8a9ae88..6fe51549d931 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rpmsg.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rpmsg.h
> @@ -186,6 +186,8 @@ int rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst,
> __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp,
> poll_table *wait);
>
> +struct class *rpmsg_get_class(void);
> +
> #else
>
> static inline int rpmsg_register_device(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> @@ -296,6 +298,14 @@ static inline __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline struct class *rpmsg_get_class(void)
> +{
> + /* This shouldn't be possible */
> + WARN_ON(1);
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPMSG) */
>
> /* use a macro to avoid include chaining to get THIS_MODULE */
> --
> 2.17.1
>