Sali Thomas
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 20:30 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the patch.
You are very welcome.
Am 27.10.21 um 17:25 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler:
From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Today's -next fails building arm64 defconfig as follows:
ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vunmap from
namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it.
ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vmap from
namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: commit 4b2b5e142ff4 ("drm: Move GEM memory managers into modules")
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c
index 6f7b3f8ec04d3..69f8564ad11cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
#include <drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_vma_manager.h>
+MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF);
Could this line be moved to the bottom of the file, where the other
MODULE statements are?
Hehe, good question. I was actually asking myself the same but quickly looking at a few files and they all had
it after their includes towards the top. Turns out that was rather short sighted...
Let me look more closely. Current -next has exactly 200 files with a MODULE_IMPORT_NS statement. Okay, some of
which are documentation. Anyway, 132 of which do have it with their other MODULE macros towards the end as you
suggest. 20 of which and mainly DRM stuff has it towards the top after them includes. Funny.
What does the documentation suggest?
Documentation/core-api/symbol-namespaces.rst
"It is advisable to add the MODULE_IMPORT_NS() statement close to other module
metadata definitions like MODULE_AUTHOR() or MODULE_LICENSE(). Refer to section
5. for a way to create missing import statements automatically."
There you go. Plus there is even some fancy automation (;-p).
So let me move it down there then.
In the fixed commit 4b2b5e142ff4, there's a similar change for
drm_gem_shmem_helper.c. It uses dma-buf_vmap as well. Does that module
require the same fix?
Likely. Let me just run ze automation and see what we get...
Do you have any idea why I don't see these errors in my builds?
Well, I guess, there are various KCONFIG symbols influencing that whole story. How about e.g.
init/Kconfig:config MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS
Best regards
Thomas
Cheers
Marcel
+
/**
* DOC: cma helpers
*
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature