Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: opp: Allow multi-worded node names

From: Dmitry Osipenko
Date: Fri Oct 22 2021 - 01:58:44 EST


22.10.2021 07:43, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> On 20-10-21, 09:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:19:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> Not all OPP table names and OPP entries consist of a single word. In
>>> particular NVIDIA Tegra OPP tables use multi-word names. Allow OPP node
>>> and OPP entry name to have multi-worded names to silence DT checker
>>> warnings about the multi-word names separated by hyphen.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
>>> index ae3ae4d39843..298cf24af270 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ select: false
>>>
>>> properties:
>>> $nodename:
>>> - pattern: '^opp-table(-[a-z0-9]+)?$'
>>> + pattern: '^opp-table(-[a-z0-9]+)*$'
>>
>> I don't see how this helps you. What I see needed upstream is a prefix:
>>
>> '-?opp-table(-[0-9]+)?$'
>
> I wonder if we should disallow that to keep naming more consistent.
>
>> Though really what I'd like to see is the OPP nodes moved into the
>> device nodes they belong to when appropriate (i.e. when not shared
>> between multiple devices).
>
> +1
>
> The only reason for keeping it outside was because CPUs were sharing them.
>

Not very doable for Tegra device-trees. Those OPP tables are huge, it's
impractical to put them into device nodes.