Re: [PATCH 14/20] exit/syscall_user_dispatch: Send ordinary signals on failure

[Eric W. Biederman]

Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:37:23AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:44:00PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> Use force_fatal_sig instead of calling do_exit directly.  This ensures
>> >> the ordinary signal handling path gets invoked, core dumps as
>> >> appropriate get created, and for multi-threaded processes all of the
>> >> threads are terminated not just a single thread.
>> >
>> > Yeah, looks good. Should be no visible behavior change.
>> 
>> It is observable in that an entire multi-threaded process gets
>> terminated instead of a single thread.  But since these events should
>> be handling of extra-ordinary events I don't expect there is anyone
>> who wants to have a thread of their process survive.
>
> Right -- sorry, I should have said that more clearly: "Besides the
> single thread death now taking the whole process, there's not behavior
> change (i.e. the signal delivery)." Still looks good to me.

Yes.  I just didn't want that single vs multi-thread case to sneak up on
people.  Especially since that is part of the questionable behavior that
I am sorting out.

Eric