Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Wed Oct 20 2021 - 22:09:50 EST


[+cc Keith, Sinan, Oza]

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:12PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> In the EDR path, AER registers are cleared *after* DPC error event is
> processed. The process stack in EDR is:
>
> edr_handle_event()
> dpc_process_error()
> pci_aer_raw_clear_status()
> pcie_do_recovery()
>
> But in DPC path, AER status registers are cleared *while* processing
> the error. The process stack in DPC is:
>
> dpc_handler()
> dpc_process_error()
> pci_aer_clear_status()
> pcie_do_recovery()

These are accurate but they both include dpc_process_error(), so we
need a hint to show why the one here is different from the one in the
EDR path, e.g.,

dpc_handler
dpc_process_error
if (reason == 0)
pci_aer_clear_status # uncorrectable errors only
pcie_do_recovery

> In EDR path, AER status registers are cleared irrespective of whether
> the error was an RP PIO or unmasked uncorrectable error. But in DPC, the
> AER status registers are cleared only when it's an unmasked uncorrectable
> error.
>
> This leads to two different behaviours for the same task (handling of
> DPC errors) in FFS systems and when native OS has control.

FFS?

I'd really like to have a specific example of how a user would observe
this difference. I know you probably don't have two systems to
compare like that, but maybe we can work it out manually.

I guess you're saying the problem is in the native DPC handling, and
we don't clear the AER status registers for ERR_NONFATAL,
ERR_NONFATAL, etc., right?

I think the current behavior is from 8aefa9b0d910 ("PCI/DPC: Print AER
status in DPC event handling"), where Keith explicitly mentions those
cases. The commit log here should connect back to that and explain
whether something has changed.

I cc'd Keith and the reviewers of that change in case any of them have
time to dig into this again.

> Bring the same semantics for clearing the AER status register in EDR
> path and DPC path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> index faf4a1e77fab..68899a3db126 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(pdev, &info) &&
> aer_get_device_error_info(pdev, &info)) {
> aer_print_error(pdev, &info);
> - pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -297,6 +296,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dpc_handler(int irq, void *context)
> struct pci_dev *pdev = context;
>
> dpc_process_error(pdev);
> + pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
>
> /* We configure DPC so it only triggers on ERR_FATAL */
> pcie_do_recovery(pdev, pci_channel_io_frozen, dpc_reset_link);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> Linux-kernel-mentees@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees