Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation

[Sean Christopherson]

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 20.10.2021 00:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> I have always used the chronological order but your argument about
> reviewers being able to quickly see the delta makes sense - will switch
> to having the latest changes on the top in the next version.
> 
> By the way, looking at the current https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ at the
> time I am writing this, while most of v3+ submissions are indeed
> using the "latest on the top" order, some aren't:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210813145302.3933-1-kevin3.tang@xxxxxxxxx/T/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211015024658.1353987-1-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YW%2Fq70dLyF+YudyF@T590/T/ (this one uses a
> hybrid approach - current version changes on the top, remaining changeset
> in chronological order).

Some people are heathens that have yet to be enlightened.  Rest assured I'll do
plenty of prosthelytizing should they ever post to arch/x86/kvm ;-)