Re: [PATCH 02/67] vfs: Provide S_KERNEL_FILE inode flag

From: David Howells
Date: Tue Oct 19 2021 - 15:03:35 EST

Next message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: [PM] bfcc1e67ff: kernel-selftests.breakpoints.step_after_suspend_test.fail"
Previous message: Miguel Ojeda: "Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom with clang"
In reply to: Jeff Layton: "Re: [PATCH 02/67] vfs: Provide S_KERNEL_FILE inode flag"
Next in thread: David Howells: "[PATCH 03/67] vfs, fscache: Force ->write_inode() to occur if cookie pinned for writeback"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It'd be better to fold this in with the patch where the first user is
> added. That would make it easier to see how you intend to use it.

Yeah - I didn't put it in there because as I zip backwards and forwards
through the patch stack, applying/deapplying this change triggers a complete
rebuild.

David

Next message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: [PM] bfcc1e67ff: kernel-selftests.breakpoints.step_after_suspend_test.fail"
Previous message: Miguel Ojeda: "Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom with clang"
In reply to: Jeff Layton: "Re: [PATCH 02/67] vfs: Provide S_KERNEL_FILE inode flag"
Next in thread: David Howells: "[PATCH 03/67] vfs, fscache: Force ->write_inode() to occur if cookie pinned for writeback"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]