[PATCH 5.10 020/103] btrfs: deal with errors when replaying dir entry during log replay

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Oct 18 2021 - 09:39:58 EST


From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>

commit e15ac6413745e3def00e663de00aea5a717311c1 upstream.

At replay_one_one(), we are treating any error returned from
btrfs_lookup_dir_item() or from btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() as meaning
that there is no existing directory entry in the fs/subvolume tree.
This is not correct since we can get errors such as, for example, -EIO
when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's btree.

So fix that and return the error to the caller when it is not -ENOENT.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -1938,7 +1938,14 @@ static noinline int replay_one_name(stru
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dst_di)) {
+
+ if (dst_di == ERR_PTR(-ENOENT))
+ dst_di = NULL;
+
+ if (IS_ERR(dst_di)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(dst_di);
+ goto out;
+ } else if (!dst_di) {
/* we need a sequence number to insert, so we only
* do inserts for the BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY types
*/