Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Use raise_softirq_irqoff() in cpu_dead notifier

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Mon Oct 18 2021 - 03:45:53 EST


On 2021-09-30 12:37:54 [+0200], To linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> __raise_softirq_irqoff() adds a bit to the pending sofirq mask and this
> is it. The softirq won't be handled in a deterministic way but randomly
> when an interrupt fires and handles softirq in its irq_exit() routine or
> if something randomly checks and handles pending softirqs in the call
> chain before the CPU goes idle.
>
> Add a local_bh_disable/enable() around the IRQ-off section which will
> handle pending softirqs.

ping

> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/irq_poll.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/irq_poll.c b/lib/irq_poll.c
> index 2f17b488d58e1..2b9f797642f60 100644
> --- a/lib/irq_poll.c
> +++ b/lib/irq_poll.c
> @@ -191,11 +191,13 @@ static int irq_poll_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
> * If a CPU goes away, splice its entries to the current CPU
> * and trigger a run of the softirq
> */
> + local_bh_disable();
> local_irq_disable();
> list_splice_init(&per_cpu(blk_cpu_iopoll, cpu),
> this_cpu_ptr(&blk_cpu_iopoll));
> __raise_softirq_irqoff(IRQ_POLL_SOFTIRQ);
> local_irq_enable();
> + local_bh_enable();
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.33.0
>

Sebastian