Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the block tree

From: Paul Moore
Date: Thu Oct 07 2021 - 16:20:33 EST


On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:57 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the selinux tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/io_uring.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 3d2b8972f292 ("io_uring: optimise plugging")
>
> from the block tree and commit:
>
> 5bd2182d58e9 ("audit,io_uring,io-wq: add some basic audit support to io_uring")
>
> from the selinux tree.

It looks like some of the conflict is also due to cdc1404a4046
("lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks to io_uring") but based on a quick look
the fixup seems correct.

Thanks Stephen.

> diff --cc fs/io_uring.c
> index 73135c5c6168,f89d00af3a67..000000000000
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@@ -903,8 -917,10 +905,10 @@@ struct io_op_def
> unsigned buffer_select : 1;
> /* do prep async if is going to be punted */
> unsigned needs_async_setup : 1;
> - /* should block plug */
> - unsigned plug : 1;
> + /* opcode is not supported by this kernel */
> + unsigned not_supported : 1;
> + /* skip auditing */
> + unsigned audit_skip : 1;
> /* size of async data needed, if any */
> unsigned short async_size;
> };
> @@@ -6542,9 -6622,12 +6576,12 @@@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kioc
> const struct cred *creds = NULL;
> int ret;
>
> - if ((req->flags & REQ_F_CREDS) && req->creds != current_cred())
> + if (unlikely((req->flags & REQ_F_CREDS) && req->creds != current_cred()))
> creds = override_creds(req->creds);
>
> + if (!io_op_defs[req->opcode].audit_skip)
> + audit_uring_entry(req->opcode);
> +
> switch (req->opcode) {
> case IORING_OP_NOP:
> ret = io_nop(req, issue_flags);
> @@@ -7042,10 -7071,34 +7082,15 @@@ static int io_init_req(struct io_ring_c
> if (!req->creds)
> return -EINVAL;
> get_cred(req->creds);
> + ret = security_uring_override_creds(req->creds);
> + if (ret) {
> + put_cred(req->creds);
> + return ret;
> + }
> req->flags |= REQ_F_CREDS;
> }
> - state = &ctx->submit_state;
> -
> - /*
> - * Plug now if we have more than 1 IO left after this, and the target
> - * is potentially a read/write to block based storage.
> - */
> - if (!state->plug_started && state->ios_left > 1 &&
> - io_op_defs[req->opcode].plug) {
> - blk_start_plug(&state->plug);
> - state->plug_started = true;
> - }
> -
> - if (io_op_defs[req->opcode].needs_file) {
> - req->file = io_file_get(ctx, req, READ_ONCE(sqe->fd),
> - (sqe_flags & IOSQE_FIXED_FILE));
> - if (unlikely(!req->file))
> - ret = -EBADF;
> - }
>
> - state->ios_left--;
> - return ret;
> + return io_req_prep(req, sqe);
> }
>
> static int io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com