Re: [PATCH] proc: test that /proc/*/task doesn't contain "0"

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Oct 07 2021 - 14:52:42 EST

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree"
Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC PATCH v5 06/10] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->write_inode operation"
In reply to: Alexey Dobriyan: "[PATCH] proc: test that /proc/*/task doesn't contain "0""
Next in thread: Alexey Dobriyan: "Re: [PATCH] proc: test that /proc/*/task doesn't contain "0""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:27:14 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Could we please have a changelog :(

Why are we doing this?

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree"
Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RFC PATCH v5 06/10] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->write_inode operation"
In reply to: Alexey Dobriyan: "[PATCH] proc: test that /proc/*/task doesn't contain "0""
Next in thread: Alexey Dobriyan: "Re: [PATCH] proc: test that /proc/*/task doesn't contain "0""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]