Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] regulator/mfd/clock: dt-bindings: Samsung S2M and S5M to dtschema

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05/10/2021 15:14, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>>> Merging/dependencies
>>> ====================
>>> 1. Regulator related binding changes depend on first two commits (the
>>>    fixes), because of context.
>>> 2. The mfd bindings depend on clock and regulator bindings.
>>>
>>> The fixes and bindings changes (patches 1-10) should go via the same
>>> tree.  For example regulator or mfd tree.  I propose the regulator tree,
>>> since it will have also one driver change (the fix, first commit).
>>
>> Lee, Stephen, Michael does Krzysztof's plan make sense to you?
> 
> I tend to take cross subsystem patches.  MFD is usually in the centre
> of these scenarios and I have tooling to easily set-up immutable
> branches/pull-requests.
> 
> Always happy to discuss if others have different/better ideas though.
> 

Another alternative is that regulator patches (1-2, 4-6) go via Mark who
later gives you a stable branch/tag to pull. Then the clock and MFD
bindings would go on top via MFD tree.

There is a comment from Rob which I will fix in v3.

Best regards,
Krzysztof