Re: [PATCH bpf v1] unix: fix an issue in unix_shutdown causing the other end read/write failures

From: Song Liu
Date: Tue Oct 05 2021 - 18:18:28 EST




> On Oct 4, 2021, at 5:04 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/4/2021 4:25 PM, Jiang Wang wrote:
>> Commit 94531cfcbe79 ("af_unix: Add unix_stream_proto for sockmap")
>> sets unix domain socket peer state to TCP_CLOSE
>> in unix_shutdown. This could happen when the local end is shutdown
>> but the other end is not. Then the other end will get read or write
>> failures which is not expected.
>>
>> Fix the issue by setting the local state to shutdown.
>>
>> Fixes: 94531cfcbe79 (af_unix: Add unix_stream_proto for sockmap)
>> Suggested-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch looks like it has fixed the problem. My test cases
> are now getting expected results consistently. Please add any
> or all of:
>
> Tested-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>

>
>> ---
>> net/unix/af_unix.c | 9 +++++----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> index efac5989edb5..0878ab86597b 100644
>> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> @@ -2882,6 +2882,9 @@ static int unix_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int mode)
>>
>> unix_state_lock(sk);
>> sk->sk_shutdown |= mode;
>> + if ((sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM || sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) &&
>> + mode == SHUTDOWN_MASK)
>> + sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
>> other = unix_peer(sk);
>> if (other)
>> sock_hold(other);
>> @@ -2904,12 +2907,10 @@ static int unix_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int mode)
>> other->sk_shutdown |= peer_mode;
>> unix_state_unlock(other);
>> other->sk_state_change(other);
>> - if (peer_mode == SHUTDOWN_MASK) {
>> + if (peer_mode == SHUTDOWN_MASK)
>> sk_wake_async(other, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_HUP);
>> - other->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
>> - } else if (peer_mode & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
>> + else if (peer_mode & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
>> sk_wake_async(other, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
>> - }
>> }
>> if (other)
>> sock_put(other);